Steiner Cobra 10x42
The producer boasts of applying special dynamic contrast coatings which increase the contrast during the observations in the forest, allowing you to spot animals against their habitat easier. The binoculars are completely waterproof up to a depth of 3 meters and nitrogen-filled; their working temperatures range from –20 to +80 degrees centigrade. The binoculars come with a 10-year guarantee of the producer.
Magnification | Lens diameter | Angular field of view | Prisms | Eye relief | Weight | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 42 | 100/1000(5.7o) | BaK-4/roof | ? mm | 798 g | 1495 PLN |
Summary
Pros:
- very solid and tough casing,
- sensible correction of chromatic aberration,
- slight astigmatism,
- good coma correction,
- appropriate blackening of the tube inside the binoculars,
- high quality of prisms made of BaK-4 glass,
- sharp image already from 1.6 metres.
Cons:
- too low transmission level in the centre of the visible spectrum and for blue colour,
- weak image quality on the edge of the field of view,
- noticeably truncated light exit pupil.
The Steiner Cobra 10x42 would be a very interesting option indeed if not for two serious flaws. The first one is, of course, its transmission – the appropriate graph we present below.
Its artificial limiting in the centre of the visible spectrum and the increase of its red part so brown animals are easier to trace and spot against the greenery of the forest doesn’t convince me at all. Personally I think the binoculars with a flat transmission graph on a level of 92-93% would perform much better, providing a more natural image.
The second problem is the sharpness of the image on the edge of the field of view. The binoculars don’t bowl you over with the size of that field. The best 10x42 class models can provide a field as wide as 6.5-6.8 degrees. The 5.7 degrees, the result of the Steiner, is perhaps not exactly bad because such a field is still comfortable to use, without creating an impression of looking through a narrow tunnel. However, such a limited field of view, especially if compared to the best models, should have been much flatter, with a better sharpness on the edge.
In other categories the binoculars get good or average results, without any serious slip-ups. Taking it into account and remembering its great ruggedness we admit the Steiner was very close to gain our recognition. Unfortunately the flaws we mentioned before force us to describe that product as just average. At that price point you can pick and choose among different rival pairs of binoculars which performances are similar or better.