Fujinon KF 10x42W
All air-to-glass surfaces are to be covered by high quality MC coatings which guarantee a high transmission level of the whole instrument and good colour rendering.
The body of the binoculars is made of aluminum padded with anti-skidding, reinforced rubber which will guarantee a firmer grip. The binoculars are waterproof and nitrogen- filled.
In the standard accessory kit you get: protective caps for objective lenses, a strap and a case with another strap. The binoculars of this series come with a 10-year long guarantee.
| Magnification | Lens diameter | Angular field of view | Prisms | Eye relief | Weight | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 42 | 105/1000(6o) | BaK-4/roof | 15 mm | 850 g | 2499 PLN |
| Real front lens diameter |
Left: 41.9+/-
0.05 mm Right: 41.86+/- 0.05 mm |
7.5 / 8.0 pkt | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real magnification | 10.41+/- 0.05x | 3/3.0 | ||||
| Transmission | 81.9+/- 1.5% | 10/25.0 | ||||
| Chromatic aberration | Noticeable in the centre but not very bothersome. Huge on the edge. | 3.8/10.0 | ||||
| Astigmatism | A bit lower than average. | 6.5/10.0 | ||||
| Distortion | The distance of the first curved line from the field centre compared to the field of view radius: 47% ± 4% | 5/10.0 | ||||
| Coma | It appears in the distance of 60% from the centre of the field and reaches high level on the very edge. | 4/10.0 | ||||
| Blurring at the edge of the FOV | The blur occurs in the distance of 80% +\- 4% from the field of vision’s centre. | 5.5/10.0 | ||||
| Darkening at the edge the FOV | Slight | 3.9/5.0 | ||||
| Whiteness of the image | Deep transimssion hollow for green light. The highest transmission level for red light. | 3.3/5.0 | ||||
| Collimation | Perfect. | 5/5.0 | ||||
| Internal reflections |
|
3.6/5.0 | ||||
| Housing | Big and heavy for a 42 mm class instrument but very solid. Padded with high-quality rubber which sticks out a bit near objectives. Comfortable to hold and to look through. Twist-lock eyecups with fluid regulation. | 7.5/8.0 | ||||
| Focusing | Big and comfortable central wheel which moves smoothly. Full turn through 570 degrees. Individual focusing through click-stop on the central wheel, nothing moves outside. In outermost positions the click-stop is sometimes jammed in. | 4.5/5.0 | ||||
| Tripod | There is a comfortable exit but at the front of the binoculars, far from the centre of mass. | 2/3.0 | ||||
| Interpupilary distance | from 55.1 to 75.4mm | 5/6.0 | ||||
| Closest focusing distance | 2.2 m | 1.5/2.0 | ||||
| Eyepieces FOV | Apparent field of view of 61.6 deg (according to simple formula) and 56.6 deg (according to tangent formula). | 11.5/20.0 | ||||
| Field of view | Measured by us amounted to 5.92 +\- 0.04 degrees and it was a bit narrower than stated in specifications. Typical field of view for this class of equipment. | 5/8.0 | ||||
| Quality of the interior of the barrels | Black and matt inner tubes, dark bottom. Clean. | 4.8/5.0 | ||||
| Vignetting |
|
7/8.0 | ||||
| Prisms quality | Good quality BaK-4. | 8/8.0 | ||||
| Antireflection coatings | Greenish everywhere. Medium intensity. | 4.5/5.0 | ||||
| Warranty [years] | 10 | 4.5/6.0 | ||||
| Final result | 66.8% | 126.9 / 190 pkt | ||||
| Econo result | 0pkt. |
Summary
Pros:
- solid casing,
- good quality coatings and BaK – 4 prisms,
- good blackening and cleanliness inside inner tubes,
- slight light fall-off on the edge of the field,
- well-corrected astigmatism.
Cons:
- too high chromatic aberration on the edge of the field of view,
- sharp transmission decrease in the middle of the visible spectrum – for such a price segment it is a slip-up,
- significant coma,
- average price/quality ratio.
 |
Japanese Fujinon have proven they can produce big and heavy but optically sensational binoculars, which can compete successfully with much more expensive rivals, produced by the biggest market players. The instruments from the FMTR-SX series are a perfect example here. When I consulted the weight and the dimensions of the Fujinon KF 10x42 I thought its performance would be equally good. Unfortunately it wasn’t. The binoculars got many average results, they had a small slip-up in the category of chromatic aberration and, what’s more important, didn’t exactly shine in any other testing category either. Its field of view is not especially wide. Overall, although the score of 120 points is nothing to be ashamed of, for 600 Euro you can buy many better 10x42 instruments, which can be sometimes even cheaper than the Fujinon, tested here. If you can buy a better and a cheaper instrument why should you pay more after all?
 |
