.

AllBinos.com

Binoculars

There are 2249 binoculars in our database and 847 owners opinions.

You can also
compare binoculars side-by-side

Search by:

Olympus DPS-I 10x50

Pictures
  • Binoculars Olympus DPS-I 10x50
  • Binoculars Olympus DPS-I 10x50
  • Binoculars Olympus DPS-I 10x50
  • Binoculars Olympus DPS-I 10x50
Manufacturer data

Manufacturer:

Olympus
web site

Distribution / Sales:

FOTOZAKUPY.PL
web site
Specifications
Manufacturer Olympus
Model DPS-I 10x50
Lens diameter [mm] 50
Magnification [x] 10
Angular field of view [deg] 6.5
Linear field of view [m/m] 114/1000
Exit pupil [mm] 25
Eye relief [mm] 12
Min. focusing dist. [m] 6
Twilight factor 22.36
Brightness 25
Prisms Bk7/Porro
Dimensions [mm] 191x178x63
Weight [g] 855
Waterproof No
Nitogen filling No
Argon filling No
Image stabilization No
Tripod exit No
Focusing central
Warranty [years] 0
Accesories
Price 399
Additional information
Average rating (6 owners reviews)
Build quality
Optical quality
Accesories and usage
Value for money

Overall

3.67 Average
Owners reviews (6)
  1. Phil
    Phil 30 May 2021, 02:36
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Accesories and usage
    Value for money

    Overall

    IP 125.236.x.x
    Owner since: more than 10 years
    Price: 300
    User profile: Amateur

    Cons: Field curvature noticeable but well illuminated BK4 prisms action lookout 1 model weight 966 grams. Not all surfaces coated most multicoated but reflected image shows at least 2 surfaces not coated.

    Pros: very sharp easy to use rubber armoured binoculars. Had plenty of use and hold up well. Not as good as my 7 x 50 Zeiss but still not bad. Good for astronomy with some field coma/curvature near the edges.

    Summary: Overall a good pair of binoculars

  2. joe bidy
    joe bidy 9 November 2020, 00:57
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Accesories and usage
    Value for money

    Overall

    IP 109.41.x.x
    Owner since: 3 years
    Price: 65 €
    User profile: Semipro

    Cons: not suitable for very wide pupillary distance

    Pros: very good optics, in center: very little chromatic aberration good sharpness lightweight, so cheap tripods are ok

    Summary: If you don\'t have the bucks for a zeiss, buy this one.

  3. tonibat
    tonibat 22 January 2019, 12:32
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Accesories and usage
    Value for money

    Overall

    IP 139.47.x.x
    Owner since: 1 year
    Price: 90€
    User profile: Amateur

    Cons: Not waterproof. A little bulky but no heavy.

    Pros: Excellent optics, amazing detail and brightness. Fairly wide view, apparent angle of view 65°. It does have tripod exit, despite the official specification sheet, which has been copied over by reviews.

    Summary: All in all, an amazing binocular at an affordable price.

  4. ionutz
    ionutz 31 May 2015, 06:38
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Accesories and usage
    Value for money

    Overall

    IP 109.255.x.x
    Owner since: 5 years
    Price: 112
    User profile: Amateur

    Cons: Cost was to high for performance.

    Pros: Very bright, ideal in low light and astronomy.

    Summary: good optics, sharp and bright.

  5. haristup
    haristup 1 August 2011, 22:22
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Accesories and usage
    Value for money

    Overall

    IP 92.36.x.x
    Owner since: 2 years
    Price: 90$
    User profile: Amateur

    Cons: 1

    Pros: 1

    Summary: not bad ,not impresive,litl more expensive for this qualiti.veri bad coated,but solid for ocasional use.

  6. Samis Gomes
    Samis Gomes 19 June 2011, 18:17
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Accesories and usage
    Value for money

    Overall

    IP 200.100.x.x
    Owner since: 2 years
    Price: $ 65
    User profile: Semipro

    Cons: Adjust diotropic no solid, this a little loose.

    Pros: Good optic and construction. Great quality for the money. Focus is good, and image is clarity.

    Summary: And binocular really well built, with excellent finishing, but could have a better eye relief and a fairer adjustment diotropic. It's certainly far better than the Celestron busnhell and sold in the same price range.