Hands-on review: Vortex Viper HD 20-60x85 spotting scope
1. A short review of the Vortex Viper HD 20-60x85 angled spotting scope
Diamondback spotting scopes are the cheapest, with prices starting from 500 USD, then you get more expensive Vipers HD and finally you reach the most expensive, high-end Razor HD series with the highest number of models available. Still, if you plan to buy an 85 mm Razor model you have to spend as much as 2000 USD on it.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
That's why we really fancied a test of a device from the Vortex Viper HD spotting scopes series just to see whether its properties are as excellent as the properties of the binoculars. There are 65 and 85 mm models offered in strait or angled versions and we decided to borrow the angled Vortex Viper HD 20- 60×85 which suggested retail price, as stated on the official site of the producers, amounts to 1349 USD; in Poland that spotter is available for 3500 PLN. It is noticeably higher than prices of binoculars from that series but you have to remember that you deal here with a big objective lens coming with an optically complex zoom eyepiece.
Front lens diameter: | 85 mm |
Magnification: | 20–60× |
Field of view: | 1.9–1.0 deg |
Minimal focusing distance: | 11 meters |
Eye relief: | 17.8–19.6 mm |
Length: | 444.5 mm |
Weight: | 2171 grams |
The producers declare that they employ XR multi-coatings that are supposed to cover all air-to-glass surfaces. Additionally inner elements are covered by hydrophobic ArmorTek coatings, protecting the exterior lenses of the instrument from dirt, humidity, and scratches. What's interesting, the producers also mention dielectric coating - most probably dielectric reflection layer is located at the surface of the additional prism placed behind the Porro system.
The spotting scope is sealed and waterproof. What's more, its tube is argon filled in order to make the instrument resistant to internal fogging even if you move through extreme changes in temperatures.
From the mechanical point of view the scope presents itself very well. Protective rubber armour is of very high quality – its properly rough surface sticks to your hands very well. It isn't loose in any place, covering the device in a great way. All mechanisms perform as they should. A retractable build-in sunshade can be extended very smoothly, revealing a metal chasis of the spotting scope and protecting the front element which hides inside the optical tube over 5 cm deep. The tripod mount collar, mentioned above, and the focusing collar perform in an exemplary manner. The mount and its interior, along with area around the prisms, are black and matt, without any slits or gaps. As you see, you deal here with a seamlessly weather-sealed instrument.
The Pentax PF 80ED-A spotting scope was chosen for comparison's sake. It is equipped with three eyepieces: the 30 mm Plossl Vixen with magnification of 17.3x and an apparent field of view of 50 degrees, the 13 mm Vixen LVW, with magnification of 39.9x and an apparent field of view of 65 degrees, and the 8 mm Baader Hyperion, with magnification of 64.8x and a field of 68 degrees. The Vortex spotting scope was tested at 20, 40 and 60x magnification.
A close look at images, offered by the Viper HD 20-60×85 suggest that indeed high quality low dispersion glass can be found inside. Images are not completely devoid of chromatic aberration but it is not a serious problem no matter what magnification you employ. It will be the most bothersome at 20×, being noticeable in the centre and medium on the very edge. In our classification by points, used in the case of binoculars, the spotter would get 5.5 points in this category. When you pass to 40× aberration decreases both in the centre and on the edge of the field – as a result this device would score at least 7.5. With 60× magnification you can observe an interesting phenomenon – aberration increases slightly in the centre but it decreases by the same degree on the edge of the field so the score would remain the same.
When you deal with an eyepiece with a narrow field of view you can expect good sharpness across the whole field. The eyepiece of the Viper doesn't have any serious difficulties in this area although its performance is not perfect. Using 20× magnification you can notice very slight decrease of sharpness, visible only in the last 5-10% of the field of view. In the middle of the focal range the result of the eyepiece is practically the same. The situation changes only at 60× where the level of sharpness goes down a bit more, encompassing the last 10-15% of the field of view.
If you compare the Vortex Viper HD 20–60×85 with the Pentax and its fixed-focal eyepieces you find out its task was very difficult. What are the conclusions? We noticed a difference in colouring of images. The Pentax provides colder hues, perhaps slightly tinted blue. The Vortex, on the other hand, offers warmer, slightly yellowish images. I admit I found the Vortex images more pleasing to the eye.
It is also hardly a surprise that primes provide images that, overall, seem sharper in the centre and are a tad better contrasted. The biggest differences you could spot at both ends of focal range and the least pronounced are in the middle. It seems that, when it comes to the Viper, the area close to 40× provides the nicest images and, generally, all optical aberrations are corrected at that place the best.
We also took photos of the exit pupil in order to assess its shape and number of reflections near it; below you can find its images taken at 20×, 40×, and 60× magnifications.
Then we tested the scope at night in order to show how the optics of the Viper deals with astigmatism, coma, and brightness loss on the edge of the field. We admit we set the standards very high - after all an eyepiece with a narrow field of view has to be corrected perfectly well, otherwise we might criticize it rather harshly.
Still we can say that the eyepiece definitely passed our test with flying colours. We didn't notice any trace of coma or brightness loss practically across the whole field of view, no matter what magnification we employed. Images or stars were point-like even close to the diaphragm. If we wanted to allot poins like in our tests of binoculars then at 20× the result would reach a maximum level of 10 points and at higher magnifications it would amount to 9-9.5 points.
To sum up we can say that the Vortex Viper HD 20–60×85 is a spotting scope with very good optics. What's more, its build quality we found beyond reproach. Its only flaw is the narrow field of view of the zoom eyepiece you get in the box. Unfortunately it often happens with spotting scopes, especially if they feature a closed fixing system of eyepiece, one that doesn't allow to use the 1.25 inch standard. We think that, if producers already decide to go in that direction they at least should offer you 2-3 fixed-focus eyepieces apart from the zoom one. I think a 20-30× model with a field of view of 60-70 degrees should be obligatory as it is able to recompense an exeptionally narrow field offered by the zoom eyepiece at 20×. Vortex do feature such an eyepiece in their line-up but only with an in-build grid. The second eyepiece I would love to see as a part of the accessory kit is a 40-50× model with a field of 60-70 degrees. Contrary to smaller magnifications, at 60× the zoom eyepiece offers you the widest field of view, there is no need to complement it with another wide angle fixed-focal eyepiece. Still, it would be very welcome. Another wide angle prime eyepiece in the set could offer you a much better image than the zoom and its field would be a tad wider as well. In order not to duplicate the 60× magnification producers could add, for example, an 70-80× eyepiece which would allow to develop in full the potential of a good quality 85 mm objective lens with low dispersion glass. After all such magnification would come in handy for long-range uses during a sunny day and also it would allow you to admire the Moon, the brightest planets, binary stars, multiple-star systems, planetary nebulas , or globular clusters at night.